By: Buffalo

How much can digital first help to tell the unbiased truth, how digital was it for President Obama watch live on drones viewing the asking for help and the destruction that followed on the Embassy in which American’s died only for him to go around and make speeches that it was a video that sparked this before the truth came out, this might not have room in this conversation buy it is very digital or a bi product of digital to come, yet who will report the truth to this invasion of digital awareness that was not reported and used to manipulate others before the truth came out, would this be digital in the past tense. Do we think real time digital should be controlled or is free speech the right to digitally improvise how to edit what is happening or what could happen or better yet just let anyone of the first responders who can knowingly view in real time and than just keep it secret because they have the power to later say there was a lot more at stake by not telling the truth in the first place. Who has the right to control this and instead of saying that those will be found and punished when in the first place it should have not happened at all. First digital is the way to the future but it should be used in a way where all views are created equal and not just to report so this future could have saved lives and not just be used for the short comings of one at the top of the food chain to have the right to say I am sorry for something and making it worse through digital communication just to say I am sorry is not enough unless it really was a mistake. We say Politics has it’s place but not to digitally use it for reasons of manipulation of a for sale sign after you have raised the price of life. The balance of journalistic value from print to digital is more or has more than just after the fact value now that digital is involved in changing life in real time which will change the journalist who will write the book or digitally make that decision. The process of old ways of print to the new ways of digital is a lot more than just an option unless the only use for digital is for journalism which is no longer the case no matter what professor in any liberal or conservative college teaches digital has the speed to control more than journalism it has the power to persuade a persons views in real time what is the option to that or will that come out digitally later? What I have said is not to point any fingers though it could appear that way because hopefully there are a lot more good things that the speed of digital has worked and helped improve but have yet to be reported , to me that has more value and to make that a contagious option will be hard to do because the price or reporting seems to be worth more when one reports and distorts the truth to magnify that key word that catches your attention that sells and that structure of pay for dirt and add a little water on it makes mud , the harder it is to wash off the more it is worth to the ones that profit by negativity but they would say we are only reporting this so it does not happen to anyone else, that old saying do not ask a question unless you already know the answer because it gets very expensive for those FIVE little words that can be so big in value, so what does digital have to say to them besides WHAT WHO WHEN WHERE and WHY or is it just the option value that they all start off with the letter W ? I am sure that I have left something out like what does that have to do with me and my family and friends and I am sure it has to do with the word EVERTHING!!!!!